Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3887 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than Core i5-750 - 278 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-750 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $72.0 vs $120.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-10320 - $0.29 vs $0.43 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Buy for $72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |