Buy on Amazon
$60
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4501 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 20% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-750 - 146 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-750 - $39.99 vs $60.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-750 Quad-Core Desktop Processor (BX80605I5750) 8M Cache, 2.66 GHz, LGA1156
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74285 minutes ago
CUK Intel Celeron G6900 Alder Lake Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) 46W Intel UHD Graphics 710 (OEM Tray Version)
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74285 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
427
26.637554585152838%
Multi-Core
1200
44.510385756676556%
Intel Core i5-750 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
