Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2159 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Core i5-4690K - 278 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 65 vs 88 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $53.0 vs $120.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-10320 - $0.19 vs $0.43 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Buy for $53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 88 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |