Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3161 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-2120T - 207 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $50.0 vs $139.99
- Up to 62% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-10320 - $0.26 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
207
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
38.23529411764706%
Price, $
$139.99
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58287 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
190
91.78743961352657%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58288 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
423
27.485380116959064%
Multi-Core
816
17.639429312581065%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-2120T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |