Buy on Amazon
$139.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $127
Availability
MSRP in USD: $127
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3161 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 22% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-2120T - 131 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $50.0 vs $139.99
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel® Core™ i3-10320 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110320
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-2120T Dual-Core Processor 2.6 GHz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I32120T
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i3-2120T
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-2120T
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
423
27.485380116959064%
Multi-Core
816
17.639429312581065%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-2120T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
