Key Differences
In short — Core i3-2120T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-2120T is 456 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Celeron G1620 - 153 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i3-2120T - $49.0 vs $50.0
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120T | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |