Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 91 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G1620 - 128 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |