Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 1061 days newer than Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Pentium G6950 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 55 vs 73 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $37.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76523 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |