Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 91 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-3220T - $49.0 vs $59.4
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
89.30131004366812%
Multi-Core
723
76.83315621679064%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220T |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |