Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4690 is 514 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 55 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G1620 - 239 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76012 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
34.34089000839631%
Multi-Core
723
21.88919164396004%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 84 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |