Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1492 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron G1620 - 164 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |