Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1345 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 3% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-6350 - 62 vs 60 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than FX-6350 - $98.02 vs $100.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-6350 - $1.58 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 6 vs 2 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8946 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8946 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |