Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2558 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - $100.0 vs $124.5
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 37% better in War Thunder than FX-6350 - 181 vs 132 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing War Thunder than FX-6350 - $0.69 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2433 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124.5
80%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $124.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2434 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |