Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1585 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $100.0 vs $109.99
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 8% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-6350 - 242 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
242
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |