Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1089
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1089
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1128 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $100.0 vs $120.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i7-6900K - $0.66 vs $0.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than FX-6350 - 171 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1937 minutes ago
Intel Boxed Core i7-6900K Processor (20MB Cache, up to 3.70 GHz) FC-LGA 2011-v3,BX80671I76900K
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1938 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i7-6900K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
