Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 1999 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - $100.0 vs $145.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i5-9600K - $1.67 vs $1.75 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 38% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-6350 - 83 vs 60 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5816 minutes ago
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5817 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |