Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2552 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6350 - 136 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than FX-6350 - $94.99 vs $100.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than FX-6350 - $0.7 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1959 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1960 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |