Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 3906 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - $100.0 vs $100.99
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-6350 - 188 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 10% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-6350 - $0.54 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1984 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100.99
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1984 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |