Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 3172 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - $100.0 vs $121.98
- Up to 10% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i3-12100 - $0.47 vs $0.52 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 11% better in Fortnite than FX-6350 - 236 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 60 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Buy for $121.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |