Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 1951 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-9100 - $100.0 vs $140.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-9100 - $0.4 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 3% better in Monster Hunter: World than FX-6350 - 257 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |