Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7600 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7600 is 1345 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than FX-6350 - 200 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than FX-6350 - $99.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Valheim than FX-6350 - $0.49 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2140 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |