Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 2316 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3770 - 131 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i3-9100 - $122.03 vs $145.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-9100 - $1.03 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2305 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
118
90%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$122.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2304 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |