Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10100 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2558 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 47% better in F1 23 than FX-6350 - 221 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than FX-6350 - $92.95 vs $100.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing F1 23 than FX-6350 - $0.42 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
221
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$92.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $92.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |