Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2396 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-6350 - 229 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than FX-6350 - $98.79 vs $99.99
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
Buy for $98.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Athlon |
Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |