Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 793 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $100.0 vs $130.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-6700 - $0.86 vs $1.07 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 5% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-6350 - 122 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |