Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 1765 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6700 - 161 vs 158 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $124.0 vs $128.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6700 - $0.77 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 12 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $128 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $124 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |