Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 735 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G3930 - 135 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $96.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 8% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G3930 - $0.71 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 6 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5473 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5474 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |