Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 1207 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G3930 - 133 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $94.99 vs $98.02
- Up to 13% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G3930 - $0.71 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5347 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5347 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |