Buy on Amazon
$98.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $187
Availability
MSRP in USD: $187
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4460 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4460 is 968 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i5-4460 - 51 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Performs up to 10% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G3930 - 190 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $64.04 vs $98.02
- Up to 40% better value when playing Dota 2 than Celeron G3930 - $0.34 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Intel Celeron G3930 2.9 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread CPU Processor 2M 51W LGA 1151
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8978 minutes ago
Core i5-4460
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-4460 LGA 1150 CPU - BX80646I54460
Buy for $64.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8977 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i5-4460
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
