Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 840 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $63.92 vs $120.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-9100F - $0.58 vs $0.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 14% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G3930 - 127 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
111
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |