Buy on Amazon
$49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $213
Availability
MSRP in USD: $213
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600 is 941 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-6600 - $49.0 vs $79.0
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Performs up to 6% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G1620 - 115 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1620 2.7 1 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1620
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Intel Boxed Core I5-6600 FC-LGA14C 3.30 Ghz 6 M Processor Cache 4 LGA 1151 BX80662I56600
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-6600
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
31.804043545878695%
Multi-Core
723
20.35472972972973%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
