Buy on Amazon
$56.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2332 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Rocket League than Celeron G1620 - 715 vs 671 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
715
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8316 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
