Buy on Amazon
$79.5
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770S outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770S is 218 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770S - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1620 - 151 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Intel Core i7-3770S Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770S
Buy for $79.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75770 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
61.13602391629297%
Multi-Core
723
32.36347358997314%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
