Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600K outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2600K is 694 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G1620 - 148 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8306 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |