Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1947 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 8% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $49.0 vs $53.55
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Fortnite than Celeron G1620 - 215 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |