Buy on Amazon
$68.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 455 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in League of Legends than Celeron G3930 - 69 vs 68 FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 6% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $63.92 vs $68.02
- Up to 5% better value when playing League of Legends than Celeron G4900 - $0.94 vs $0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 54 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
68
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930 Dual-core (2 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
