Buy on Amazon
$60
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $138
Availability
MSRP in USD: $138
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-560 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-560 is 827 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i3-560 - 55 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Performs up to 4% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron G1620 - 47 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-560
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
FPS
47
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$60
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-560 Processor 3.33 GHz 4 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-560
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
92.32505643340858%
Multi-Core
723
77.57510729613733%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-560 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2010 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Clarkdale |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
