Buy on Amazon
$100.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4053 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 12% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1620 - 166 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-14100F Desktop Processor 4 cores (4 P-cores + 0 E-cores) up to 4.7 GHz
Buy for $100.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3667 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
