Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 2098 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i3-9100 - $49.0 vs $89.1
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 5% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G1620 - 122 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Buy for $89.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
29.65917331399565%
Multi-Core
723
20.100083402835697%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |