Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2543 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1620 - 266 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
