Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2084 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $79.0 vs $87.98
- Up to 8% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-10105F - $0.66 vs $0.72 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-6600 - 122 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600 - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
91%
Price, $
$87.98
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for $87.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |