Buy on Amazon
$49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7600 is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-7600 - $49.0 vs $95.97
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Celeron G1620 - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Celeron G1620 2.7 1 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1620
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 307 minutes ago
Intel Core i5 i5-7600 Quad-Core (4 Core) 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging CM8067702868011
Buy for $95.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 308 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-7600
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
29.788783685360524%
Multi-Core
723
18.96642182581322%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
