Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G1620 vs FX-6300

Celeron G1620 vs FX-6300: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — FX-6300 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 41 days older than Celeron G1620.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620

  • Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 55 vs 95 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of AMD FX-6300

  • Performs up to 23% better in League of Legends than Celeron G1620 - 58 vs 47 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 6 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of League of Legends.
League of Legends

League of Legends

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Very High

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Celeron G1620

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


FPS

47

81%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

AMD FX-6300 Logo
FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


FPS

58

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.28/FPS

100%

Price, $

$74.04

100%

FPS and Value Winner

AMD FX-6300 Black Edition 3.5 GHz Six Core 95W OEM with Thermal Paste Bundle

Buy for $74.04 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8912 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Very High

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Celeron G1620

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012

AMD FX-6300 Logo
FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Celeron G1620

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

409

88%

Multi-Core

723

49%

AMD FX-6300 Logo
FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


Single-Core

463

100%

Multi-Core

1453

100%

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo

Intel Celeron G1620

vs
AMD FX-6300 Logo

AMD FX-6300

Dec 3rd, 2012
Release DateOct 23rd, 2012
CeleronCollectionFX
Ivy BridgeCodenameVishera
Intel Socket 1155SocketAMD Socket AM3+
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
6
2Threads
6
2.7 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.5 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed4.1 GHz
55 W
TDP95 W
22 nm
Process Size32 nm
27.0x
Multiplier17.5x
Intel HD
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Builds Using Celeron G1620 or FX-6300

League of Legends, 1920 x 1080, Very High

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.