Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 147 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G1620 - 448 vs 439 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 6 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
448
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3531 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
