Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 3% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-2300 - 258 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2300
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $45.0 vs $139.99
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
510
33.13840155945419%
Multi-Core
1490
32.20925205361003%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-2300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |