Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G1610 - 243 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $37.0 vs $139.99
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
27.680311890838205%
Multi-Core
739
15.974924340683094%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |