Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 2894 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X - $37.0 vs $175.0
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 471% better in League of Legends than Celeron G1610 - 280 vs 49 FPS
- Up to 18% better value when playing League of Legends than Celeron G1610 - $0.62 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2406 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175
21%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2407 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |