Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 1963 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $37.0 vs $210.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen 7 2700X - $0.24 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 23% better in Rust than Celeron G1610 - 188 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2430 minutes ago
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2431 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |