Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700 is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-11700 - $37.0 vs $220.47
- Up to 82% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-11700 - $0.16 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G1610 - 252 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1869 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
252
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
18%
Price, $
$220.47
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $220.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1870 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |