Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $221
Availability
MSRP in USD: $221
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 4053 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - $37.0 vs $210.47
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 286% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G1610 - 85 vs 22 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 323 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-14400 Desktop Processor 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) up to 4.7 GHz
Buy for $210.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 322 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-14400
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
17.35234215885947%
Multi-Core
739
5.995456758072367%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Celeron G1610 or Core i5-14400
Immortals of Aveum, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
23 FPS
$71.74/FPS
GeForce RTX 4060
Core i5-14400
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,649.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
