Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $221
Availability
MSRP in USD: $221
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 4053 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - $37.0 vs $229.99
- Up to 79% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-14400 - $0.32 vs $1.55 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 28% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G1610 - 148 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2002 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-14400 Desktop Processor 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) up to 4.7 GHz
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2002 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-14400
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
