Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700 is 3340 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-12700 - $37.0 vs $265.48
- Up to 83% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-12700 - $0.16 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 24% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1610 - 290 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
290
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
17%
Price, $
$265.48
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |